Friday 20th, was fully overcast and a much cooler winters day. It was not a day for Skywatching although I did spend some time observing, just to be sure.

The next day was fine again and had that "what a great day" feeling. It felt like a day worth looking for UFO activity again. At midday, the first of two sighting appeared.

Two Orbs were attached by their dangling appendage and intertwined together. They 'danced' around one another in a manner more exaggerated than if being moved by the very slight breeze at that time. One object was a soft blue colour and the other a pinkish red. I had previously seen Orbs of these colours before. They are self illuminated.

Identical Twin Orbs have been filmed in the UK and more recently in Mexico. They moved in identical manner meaning this type of object and their unique movements must be a characteristic of these particular types of UFO when seen in pairs.

At 2.00PM, a high altitude "crimson red" coloured UFO Orb was seen in the south and slowly moving north (same direction as first group) This time I had the video camera on a tripod and was able to zoom right into the object and follow it until lost from sight after an 8 minute sighting.

This object appeared to be around 25-30,000 feet when compared to high altitude commercial aircraft that fly over this location. My 'witness' was unable to see the object with the naked eye because of its high altitude.

"Jellyfish" UFO returns on the 29th.

Last year in June, UFO's were filmed during daytime and returned again 8 days later, heading back toward the direction they had previously come from, as if returning to 'base'.

My thoughts were, that this may be worth recording and testing to see if the 8day period this year also applied. AND IT HAS. There may be an association to these UFO Orbs making an 8 day 'migration' to a destination yet unknown, then returning to their start location 8 days later. If this were an accurate assumption, then it would be possible to ACCURATLY PREDICT the occurrence of UFO activity and be prepared for it with appropriate equipment to record the event, at least on the return trip.

Was this Object Hoaxed?

There has been some suggestion that this object, particularly the 29th. June sighting is a "kids party balloon", therefore not a genuine UFO as I have stated.

1. The 'tail' does not seem to move in the same manner as the 21st sighting. In the sighting of the 21st, the 'tail' is moving in a controlled and definite manner as if controlled from the lower rear of the object. The manner of 'tail' movement seems to be used to aid forward propulsion of the object. When the 'tail' stopped, the object dramatically slowed. When the 'tail' movement increased, so did the speed of the object.

This same 'tail' and object forward motion was also seen in the 1999 'Jellyfish ' UFO footage (8 min. sighting) shown on my "UFO Down-Under" DVD. Pulsing of the object is also seen as the objects gets into a rhythmic flight sequence. The combination of 'tail' movement, jerky forward motion and pulsing, demonstrated the direct association of this combination as a flight characteristic of the UFO.

The sighting 8 days later on the 29th.June 2005, shows the 'tail' is not moving in the characteristic manner seen on other objects of this type. This time, the 'tail' just seems to be "blowing in the wind" type movement. Is the origin of movement from the object itself, or could it be movement from wind? These similar UFOs filmed in the UK by Anthony Woods, show the 'tails' not moving at all and just dangle down below the objects as they move forward. This may or may not be a normal thing with the genuine UFO and would not stand alone as proof of hoaxing without other unusual features.

2. The 'tail' on the 21st. June & 1999 objects appeared as a fairly wide continuous band of 'ribbon' that reflected sunlight during its movement. The 'tail' on this 29th. object, appears to have several 'points' of reflection at regular intervals along the length of the 'tail'. This can be seen as the 'tail' moves and sunlight reflects off these points. Is this a new feature seen on a real UFO, or it is a man made hoax of this type of UFO?

3. The illumination of the object appears to be "reflected sunlight" rather than the self illuminated features seen with previous UFO's of this type. The red colour is 'held/fixed' better on the video when compared with the 'washing-out' or 'flaring' of the colour in the self illuminated previous real UFO. The sun also seems to be reflecting off the surface. Also, after the object passed overhead, I lost it in the camera viewfinder and could not pick it up again in the distance.

When comparisons are made between this UFO and previous UFOs of the same type, there are valid reasons why the 29th June object appears so good. I used a Digital 8 video camera using Hi-8 tape with 20x optical with 2x telephoto. The object was closer and lower altitude then any previous sighting therefore a closer look at the object at high optical and low digital zoom was achieved. The digital image holding the colour better than the previously used analogue camera and video tape. This means that a more suitable real life image was captured on video. This makes this piece of footage probably the best the world has seen of these types of UFOs.

I must say, that I am 100% certain the object is in fact NOT hoaxed. It is a real UFO of this type, and the above concerns are only raised because of the closeness of the object and these features becoming more apparent. But I do hold firm on these details when compared to previous sightings, and do understand why some may say the object looks like a balloon. But when you analyse ALL the available data (video) that I have gained over the past few years, the evidence is overwhelming of the genuine nature of these unusual UFO objects, otherwise tagged, "Jellyfish" UFOs.